Health is Life
  • Seminars
  • Blog
  • Training
  • Entering Wedge Media
  • Donate

Disclaimer: TheSE Articles ARE for educational purposes only (Not Medical Advice)

Breaking News: Fruit Bat Discovers Ebola Cure!

10/21/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
Okay, now that I have captured your attention with this TRUE headline, I would like you to ponder a few things… Considering the fact that fruit bats are mammals, and thus capable of becoming infected with the deadly Zaire strain of Ebola virus, what is it about the lifestyles of these “flying foxes” that may predispose them to asymptomatic (no-symptom) infection? Well, believe-it-or-not, based upon clinical research and a study of the lifestyle habits of African fruit bats, we can readily ascertain the reasons why Ebola infection may pose less threat to their physiologic function as well as learn how we also can win the fight against this dread illness… And the good news is: it’s so simple even a bat can do it!

Across the humid tropical highlands of sub-Saharan Africa, there flies a half dog-half bat looking creature on the lookout for his favorite meal. As he spies one of the local villagers he swoops down to devour his prey…. Okay let’s stop for a moment here. I know what you’re thinking: this bat-creature is about to sink its claws into the ruddy flesh of… a passion fruit, mango or jackfruit? Yes! These bats are fruitarian! While it is true the bat family, in general, have been given a bad rap (mostly due to the nasty habits of their blood-sucking South American constituents), fruit bats play an especially important role in the regional ecosystem. First of all, they spread fruit seeds far and wide in their guano (bat droppings) and secondly they help with pollination due to their tremendous appetites that keep them winging their way from tree to tree in search of food.

So, based upon what we already know about the fruit bat… what are some of the possible explanations as to why they are immune to the effects of Ebola infection? Well, for one, they are incredibly active: we know moderate physical exercise is essential in bolstering the immune response (1). Also, they rest in trees upside-down while eating, sleeping, etc. We may not need to live our lives in this state but an occasional incline, here or there, can really help increase lymphatic flow, which usually has to work against gravity, thereby bringing more lymph-based immune cells into general circulation (2). But there is something else about the bat’s lifestyle that, I believe, truly predisposes these creatures to victory in the battle over Ebola: a unique diet.

Scientists have been studying the Ebola virus since its debut in 1976, but still readily admit they have yet to find a “cure.” Strange information considering there are numerous published reports, in the medical literature, of Ebola being effectively “cured” in laboratory animals. Of special note are the studies using a complex known as mannose-binding lectin (MBL). This naturally occurring plant protein has been found to function as an opsonin: with the ability to reverse the opposing electrical charge of a pathogen and, thus, allow it to be “brought” to an immune cell (3,4,5). This process is similar to a police officer arresting and handcuffing a suspect (thereby minimizing potential threat) before the perpetrator is “brought in” to be tried by a court of law.

Another function of MBL is that it inactivates certain pathogens, such as Zaire Ebolavirus, by two specific means: 1) by directly “alter[ing] the function of microbial structures” (6); and 2) by causing the virus to bind to immune compounds known as complement, which “neutralize” the pathogen (5). In one study, published in 2011 in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, mice who had seven times the average human blood levels of mannose-binding lectin survived “fatal Ebola virus infections and became immune to virus rechallenge” (4).

Furthermore, one of the primary goals of the Ebola virus is to infect the first-contact immune alert system (known as the dendritic cells) and use other secondary responder immune cells as a vehicle to spread throughout the body (6). In one study, published in the September 2003 edition of the journal Immunology, researchers discovered that mannose-binding lectin stops the spread of viruses (in this case the HIV virus) from infected dendritic cells to T-cells (7). What does this mean? Well, if you can stop a virus from infecting and disabling the immune system, the immune system can, in turn, have greater potential to attack and destroy the virus!

So, by now you may be wondering: where do bats come into this equation? Well, FRUIT bats, eat a lot of… well… FRUIT (8)! Not by coincidence, these fruit are naturally high in the sugar known as mannose as well as MANNOSE-BINDING LECTINS to hold these sugars structurally in place (9). Why is the Ebola virus spreading out of control in Africa? For one reason, officials are warning Africans to stay away from fruit, which, they caution may be contaminated by these “Ebola-carrying” fruit bats. This looks like a quandary: how can Africans get enough MBL if they are afraid of fruit?

Here’s the easy solution: firstly, eat plenty of fruit but avoid those that have obvious bite marks (a good practice in general), but secondly, it turns out that there are also other rich sources of MBL throughout the vegetable world (10). For example, all members of the Allium family (onions, garlic, leeks, shallots), and certain tubers (such as taro, or malanga) are naturally high in this potent compound (9). Interestingly, Nigeria is of the world’s largest commercial producers of taro (their neighbors are in need of some these timely tubers)!

With all this scientific weight of evidence, why isn’t natural mannose-binding lectin being used to prevent/ treat Ebola infections? Well, let us allow the researchers themselves to answer that question. An article recently published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry revealed that “MBL has a complex quaternary structure unsuitable for large scale cost-effective production” (3). There you have it… In laymen’s terms, it would not generate enough “[moola]” to be “[a worthwhile economic investment].” What?!?! Why is this world so often backwards in motive?

Bottom line is this: to truly benefit from these research findings we need to go to the bat to see how it’s done: eat our fresh fruits and vegetables, exercise moderately, live an out-of-doors life, and don’t worry when people blame YOU for something you are not responsible for…

By the way, the bat didn’t originate the cure for Ebola: “And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for [food]” Genesis 1:29.

The bats are listening… Are we?

P.S. Please pass this information on if you desire to positively affect your regional ecosystem
& sign up for Prebola© today at healthislife.org!



References:
1)
Exerc Immunol Rev. 2013;19:120-43.
2)
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Oct;105(10):447-56.
3)
J Biol Chem. 2010 Aug 6;285(32):24729-39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.106260.
4)
J Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 15;203(2):175-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq025.
5)
J Gen Virol. 2005 Sep;86(Pt 9):2535-42.
6)
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2002 Aug;6(4):423-31.
7)
Immunology. 2003 Sep;110(1):80-5
8)
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/Eidolon_helvum/
9)
http://www.owenfoundation.com/Health_Science/Lectins_in_Foods.html
10)
Biochimie. 2001 Jul;83(7):645-51.


2 Comments

Breaking News! Ebola Takes Flight!

10/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Okay. If you are reading this article you may be: 1) either tired of seeing the latest news regarding Ebola; 2) so worried and fearful about this spreading pandemic that you are scouring the web night and day looking for the latest Ebola-related breaking news (which causes you to worry even more incessantly); or 3) you are calmly getting prepared for what looks to be the single most dangerous threat to our country since the Cuban Missile Crises.

The truth of the matter is, you probably fall into category number one... Why? Maybe it has something to do with all of the now undeniably false assurances that we have been given by politicians and health officials (see some of my previous articles for details). Well... as of yesterday, many Americans now have reason, beyond a reasonable doubt, to disbelieve the validity of this what would appear to be an overly optimistic “peace and safety” message.

If you have not already heard, a second nurse, Amber Vinson, who cared for the US's first Ebola victim, Thomas Eric Duncan, has officially come down with the deadly infection. While this in itself is cause for alarm, to make matters even worse: even while showing signs of illness (a low grade fever), this nurse was on board a commercial jetliner filled with 132 unsuspecting passengers (1).


To her credit, before boarding the plane she reportedly contacted the CDC in reference to her possible Ebola symptoms but was told it was okay for her to fly anyway (2). Thus, due to the CDC's negligence, everyone from the cockpit all the way back to the rear lavatories could have possibly come in contact with this incredibly infectious disease! Talk about a worse-case scenario for Ebola inoculation! Furthermore, the infected plane made five additional flights before authorities began the cabin disinfection process: thus potentially exposing hundreds more individuals to the virus.

CDC's Tom Friedman, who has been downplaying the risk of Ebola to America since day one (3), reassures the American public that the risk to Vinson's fellow passengers is, in fact, "extremely low" (1).

Meanwhile President Obama, who stated weeks ago that the "experts at the CDC" believe that the risk of Ebola spreading to the US was "extremely low" (4) is now repeating same mantra in response to this new development: "I want people to understand that the dangers of you contracting Ebola, the dangers of a serious outbreak in this country are extraordinary low, but we are taking this very seriously at the highest levels of government" (5).
 
Let’s think about this for a moment… To consider a scenario so plausible that the highest levels of government would take “this very seriously” while also expressing doubts to the American public of the likelihood of the event occurring indicates an underlying attempt to bring Americans into a state of normalcy bias, which can occur when governments fail to include the general public in their disaster preparations.
 
Is this logical? If the higher levels of government should take the potential spread of Ebola seriously enough to purchase over 160,000 hazmat suits (6) shouldn’t we, the American public, take some precautions as well? Specifically, in lieu of this threat to the lives of the American public, what are politicians and governmental health officials doing to improve the physical health and bolster the immune systems of the nearly 320 million people in this country?
 
And I digress from the issues at present to reflect upon the proverbial higher governmental figure of Nero, who “played the fiddle” whilst Rome burned…
 
Don't wait for others around you to respond. Something must be done now, and individually. Keep checking back with us for more Ebola-related info, learn more about our online Prebola© Pandemic Preparedness course, and consider partnering with healthislife.org to get the word out! Yes this is a call for means: we need financial resources to spread the message of preparedness far and wide! Together we can make a BIG difference!

 References:
1) http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/15/health/texas-ebola-outbreak/index.html
2) http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/10/report_amber_vinson_dallas_nur.html
3) http://twitchy.com/2014/10/15/nine-ebola-tweets-that-the-cdc-probably-wishes-it-could-take-back/
4) http://www.nbcnews.com/watch/nbc-news/obama-says-risk-of-ebola-outbreak-in-u-s-is-extremely-low-330003523744
5) http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/obama-seeks-ease-fears-over-u-s-ebola-epidemic-n226716
6) http://investmentwatchblog.com/breaking-us-state-dept-orders-160000-hazmat-suits-for-ebola/
0 Comments

ZMapp: A Plant-Based Solution?

10/14/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
With most of the high-profile repatriated Ebola cases in the US receiving the new anti-Ebolavirus therapy known as “ZMapp,” many are touting the apparent life saving effects of this supposed “miracle” serum. Still classified as an experimental drug, ZMapp was developed by a consortium of bio-pharmaceutical companies and US/ Canadian Governmental public health and defense agencies (1, 2) and has been given an unprecedented fast track into general usage due to the fact that there appear to be few alternatives. What most Americans are unaware of, however, is that ZMapp is not simply another run-of-the-mill pharmaceutical.

What makes ZMapp so different? Well, to put it simply: ZMapp is a genetic amalgamation of plant, animal, and human components (3). Does the idea of putting something like this into your body sound unusual to you? If not, maybe your thoughts will change when you learn how it’s manufactured…

In the production of ZMapp, firstly, mice are exposed to an Ebola antigen, killed, and their spleen cells harvested (4, 5, 6). These cells are then genetically fused with human myeloma cancer cells (ibid). Genetics from this strange hybridized creation are then transferred to a plant-infecting bacterium, or agrobacterium, and then infused into the leaves of the tobacco plant Nicotiana benthamiana (ibid). These are then incubated in a hydroponic greenhouse facility for several months. During this time the GMO human/mouse/bacterium swaps genes with the tobacco plant and produces antibodies that are later harvested, preserved, and packaged in serum for delivery into the human bloodstream (ibid).

If you think all of this is a little unnerving, the plot thickens… Current production of ZMapp is conducted through Kentucky BioProcessing, which is a subsidiary of RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company (7). Interestingly, RJ Reynolds acquired this company and began production of ZMapp in January, 2014, approximately the same time the current Ebola outbreak purportedly began in West Africa (ibid, 8). Coincidence? Maybe… Maybe not… But one thing is for sure: big tobacco has a lot to gain by getting the Ebola virus “under control.” First of all, because of its severe depression of innate immune responses, tobacco use is probably the single most dangerous risk factor in fatal Ebola infection (9, 10, 11, 12). Thus, should Ebola progress, RJ Reynolds would lose a lot of customers in the conflagration. Secondly, this new “wonder drug” stands to replace the normal role of a healthy human immune response vs. Ebola infection. This fits well with the “smoke-it-up” “live-it-up” lifestyle promoted by the tobacco industry.

Given its outlandish formulation and curious production background, what are politicians saying about ZMapp? Well, when asked whether or not this drug would be fast-tracked into widespread usage for West Africa, president Barack Obama stated: “I think we’ve got to let the science guide us” (13). I wholeheartedly concur! Reason being, if we were really looking at the science we would quickly discover that we may already have time-honored, plant-based, anti-viral (and thus potentially anti-Ebola) options available – and all without involving the mice spleens, cancer cells, agrobacterium, and supporting big tobacco interests.

Case in point: the therapeutic potential of black elderberry.

Sambucus Nigra, or black elderberry has been used for centuries for its immune boosting effects and even included as a tasty ingredient in homemade jams and jellies. But don’t let this culinary trivia derail you from the science behind this potent natural remedy!

But first, we need to understand a little more about the function of ZMapp. The premise behind the usefulness of this drug is that, when infected with the Ebolavirus, the human immune system often fails to produce antiviral antibodies. Therefore, bringing in backup, albeit artificial, antibodies seems logical. So, following this train of thought, Zmapp’s GMO antibodies attempt to deactivate Ebola by adhering to the sugary glycoproteins on the surface of the virus (14).

In a normal infection, our b-lymphocytes would naturally produce antibodies as a result of contact with an antigen (a foreign compound such as Ebola glycoproteins). However, it has been found that Ebola actually hides its antigenic surface from the view of “helper cells” that would normally play a role in activating antibody production (15, 16). Individuals who have naturally survived Ebola have been able to overcome this deception and carry on with the production of antibodies (17, 18). This response we would term an optimal or healthy immune response.

Where does Elderberry come in to this discussion? Well it turns out that certain compounds found in this plant actually behave somewhat like antibodies! These components are known as lectins, which are selective sugar-binding proteins. Elderberry has been found to have three distinct lectins: one specifically in the bark of the branches and at least two others in the berries. In particular, the berry lectins have been found to interact or adhere to various components of the Ebola virus (19). Furthermore, one of these lectins has a strong affinity, or bonding preference, to a section of the virus’ surface responsible for hiding the antigenic area from the immune system, known as O-linked glycans (20, 21). Thus, by interfering with this area, the virus potentially can be unmasked and exposed to the wrath of the white blood cells! Of course, you would still need to have a healthy immune response working in concert with this simple, safe, and cost-effective natural remedy – a 180-degree difference in underlying philosophy compared to ZMapp’s laissez faire, or hand’s off, approach to immune system preparedness.

Okay, so elderberry seems to have some potential merit… but you may be wondering how it stacks up to some of the other experimental anti-Ebola medications? Well, let’s see how elderberry compares with another highly publicized experimental medication called “TKM-Ebola.” This drug uses an approach known as RNA interference to halt the progression of viral function and replication (22). Interestingly, studies of Elderberry have found that it contains a similar property! Indeed, elderberry has been found to be a potent source of ribosome-inactivating proteins (23) (viruses use ribosomes to reproduce themselves inside host cells). Furthermore, these elderberry-based ribosomal interference compounds do not normally enter into the human cell cytoplasm (ibid) but may enter with the virus due to lectin attachment. Why is this important? Unnecessary ribosomal interference can lead to a host of side effects: including impaired cellular function, cancer development, and even cell death.

We’ve not even mentioned Sambucus Nigra’s tremendous antioxidant capacity and nutritive properties, but in this plant we already have a remedy that can potentially bind, unmask, and possibly even singlehandedly destroy the… “Hold on a moment” you might be thinking… “Is he actually making a claim that elderberry fights Ebola?”

Well my friend… The best way I can frame my response to you today is… Instead of genetically altering nature and attempting to circumvent the need for a healthy immune system… “I think we’ve got to let the true science guide us.”

References:
1) http://www.kentucky.com/2014/08/09/3373025_how-owensboro-tobacco-grew-a-possible.html?rh=1
2) http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g5488.long
3) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):18030-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213709109. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
4) http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkroll/2014/08/05/ebola-secret-serum-small-biopharma-the-army-and-big-tobacco/
5) Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1204:165-85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1346-6_15.
6) Nature. 2014 Oct 2;514(7520):47-53. doi: 10.1038/nature13777. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
7)http://www.journalnow.com/news/local/ebola-drug-provided-for-two-americans-by-reynolds-american-subsidiary/article_144fb3ce-1cb3-11e4-9f1b-0017a43b2370.html
8) N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1418-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404505. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9) Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34(4):283-7.
10) Toxicol Sci. 1999 Aug;50(2):214-20.
11) J Exp Med. 2004 Jul 19;200(2):169-79. Epub 2004 Jul 12.

12) J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct;116(4):916-22. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
13) http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/obama-premature-say-u-s-should-green-light-new-ebola-n174461

14) http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/ebola-cocktail-developed-at-canadian-and-u-s-labs-1.2727703
15) PLoS Pathog. 2010 Sep 9;6(9):e1001098. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001098.
16) J Virol. 2001 Feb;75(3):1576-80.
17) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1893-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209591110. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
18) Sci Transl Med. 2012 Oct 31;4(158):158ra146. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004582.
19) J Virol. 2006 Apr;80(8):3743-51.
20) PLoS Pathog. 2010 Sep 9;6(9):e1001098. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001098.
21) Biochem J. 1991 Sep 15;278 ( Pt 3):667-71.
22) Lancet. 2010 May 29;375(9729):1896-905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60357-1.
23) Toxins (Basel). 2011 May;3(5):420-41. doi: 10.3390/toxins3050420. Epub 2011 Apr 29.



1 Comment

Ebola: Bacteria to the Rescue?

10/12/2014

3 Comments

 
Picture
(Recipe Included) Researchers have found that exposure to a sugar compound known as alpha-galactose, produced by the microscopic probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus Plantarum, results in the production of immune boosting compounds known as "natural antibodies” (1,2). This occurs because the immune system recognizes alpha-galactose as a foreign entity (it's not manufactured by human cells) and directs b-lymphocytes to produce antibodies targeting its removal and destruction (3). Why is this relevant to viral infections such as Ebola?

As we learned in one of our Prebola©Pandemic Preparedness classes, many glycosylated (sugarcoated) viruses, such as Ebola and influenza contain the galactose compound (4,5,6,7). Therefore these "natural antibodies" have the potential to begin targeting galactose-specific regions of glycosylated viruses days before the b-lymphocytes begin producing antiviral antibodies. Good news considering fatal Ebola infection has been found to impair, or even completely halt, the immune system’s manufacture of Ebolavirus-specific antibodies (8,9).

Furthermore, as a byproduct of metabolism, Lactobacillus Plantarum also produces a sugar known as mannose (1). Having a healthy amount of these “friendly” bacteria in the colon can therefore translate into higher mannose concentrations in the bloodstream. It's well documented that increased levels of biologically active compounds can decrease the number of their cellular receptors (10,11,12,13). Therefore an increased amount of extracellular mannose can decrease, or downregulate, its cellular receptor, known as “mannose-binding lectin,” or MBL (14). How does this affect you? For those who would like to decrease the potential for Ebola infection: mannose-binding lectin, as displayed on the surface of the cell, has been implicated as a primary site of access (like an open door) for the entry of Ebolavirus (15). Also of import, mannose and free mannose-binding lectins (which bind to the ebolavirus and aid in it's destruction) can be obtained through a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and legumes (such as soybeans). Take home message? Long live the vegetarian and probiotian!

Intrigued? There’s so much more to learn! Click here to sign up for Prebola© today!

Are you a probiotic penny-pincher? Here’s a way to boost your probiotic yield and lower your economic expenditure by producing your own L. Plantarum rich "Ynogurt!"
Why do we call it “Ynogurt" (pronounced NO-GURT)? First of all, because it does sound kind of catchy, but primarily because the FDA won’t allow anyone to officially call a mixture “yogurt” if it is lacking the two traditional strains of yogurt-producing bacteria.

Prebola© Ynogurt
© Recipe:
3 1/2 cups soy milk or alternative (only soy actually curdles like regular yogurt but you can also use grain, or nut milk) Note: avoid preservatives such as calcium citrate, etc., as these will significantly slow bacterial culturing - we recommend using Trader Joe's plain soymilk.
2-5 Tbs thickener (arrowroot powder, ground chia seeds, ground flax seeds, etc.)
2 Tbs honey
1/4 tsp salt
1 capsule "Jarrow Formulas Ideal Bowel Support 299v" probiotic (see product details in reference section of this post) or 3-4 T leftover "Ynogurt" (see below for explanation)

Directions:
Heat milk to almost a boil, then allow to cool to about 105 degrees F (use a thermometer to check temperature). Combine soymilk (or alternative) honey, salt, and thickener in blender and mix thoroughly. Remove from saucepan and place into seal-able quart container (mason jar, etc.). Next open one capsule of probiotic and empty contents into thickened milk mixture. Place lid on container and shake well. Now wrap in towel and allow to incubate in a warm environment (85-105 degrees F). After approximately 5-7 hours you can refrigerate your Ynogurt to chill before serving.

Remember to save the last 3-4 Tablespoons to mix into another batch of Ynogurt in lieu of adding another capsule of probiotic. Store in refrigerator and discard unused Ynogurt after a few days or if you notice orange or red colored liquid (an indication of mold growth). Consider adding fruit jam, carob powder, etc. as a flavoring agent* if you do not prefer the taste of plain Ynogurt.

*Note: save 3-4 Tablespoons of plain Ynogurt before adding flavoring items if you plan on using this as a starter for another batch of Ynogurt.



References:
1) J Sci Food Agric. 2011 Sep;91(12):2284-91. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4456. Epub 2011 May 10.
2) http://www.virology.ws/2009/10/06/natural-antibody-protects-against-viral-infection/
3) Eur J Immunol. 2007 May;37(5):1254-65.
4) J Virol. 2011 Oct;85(19):10010-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00301-11. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Apr 1;407(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.110.
6) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010 Mar 15;24(5):571-85. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4410.
7) J Virol. 2004 Mar;78(6):2943-7.
8) Bull Exp Biol Med. 2001 Dec;132(6):1182-6.
9) PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 5;4(10). pii: e837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000837.
10) Diabetes. 1980 Feb;29(2):159-63.
11) J Neurochem. 2013 Dec;127(6):762-71. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12442. Epub 2013 Oct 13.
12) Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 17;5:919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00919. eCollection 2014.
13) J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;49(6):346-54.
14)
J Immunol. 2010 Aug 1;185(3):1522-31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000774. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
15) PLoS One.
2013;8(4):e60838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060838. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
3 Comments

Ebola: A First Case Scenario...

10/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Amazingly, just a short while ago we were hearing reports of the almost virtual impossibility of the Ebola Virus showing up here in the United States. For example, President Barak Obama stated that, although measures should be taken to minimize the potential, the risk of the virus spreading here was “extremely low” (1). Indeed, his was not the only voice minimizing the chance of a US Ebola outbreak: an article headlined in the Washington Post entitled “Ebola in the US Don’t Bet on it,” cited an expert’s diminutive prediction, a probability ranging from “3-15%,” that the virus would actually make its way to America (2).

Well, as many of you know… This week this purportedly highly unlikely event actually occurred: the CDC confirmed that a man showed up in America, Texas to be exact, and was diagnosed with Ebola.  You would think that public health officials would be concerned over this unexpected happening… However it seems as though there is another virulent pandemic sweeping through the ranks of the CDC: a refusal to alert the public as to the real possibilities involved in this recent development. At a press briefing discussing this occurrence, CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden stated: “I have no doubt that we will stop this in its tracks in the U.S.” (3). He went on to say that only a “handful” of people are in any real threat of catching the disease (ibid).

However, I believe that unless Dr. Frieden’s handful is big enough to hold over 313.9 million people, the current US population, he is optimistically denying the possibilities. Here are some of the reasons why: 1) According to United States Army Research, the Zaire Ebolavirus has been shown to potenitally cause full-blown infections via aerosolized droplets in environments with low relative humidity (4); 2) Many people infected with Ebola show no signs and symptoms at all (5); 3) As colder weather comes upon us and the influenza virus reemerges, it will be impossible to tell between a bad case of the flu and Ebola unless verified via blood test. Coupled with the fact that nearly 20% of the population may get the flu this season it would make testing everyone a virtual impossibility (6); 4) Our healthcare system is capable of handling relatively few actual respiratory isolation patients; and 5) Researchers are counting on being able to pull off a miracle and fast track, through bypassing normal safety testing, a vaccine to the US population before the spread of Ebola worsens – even though researchers have been working on this same project  since 1976 to no avail (7).

So here is my big question… Why aren’t Americans being told that they should be getting healthy and boosting their immune systems in preparation for a possible pandemic? Studies examining how the virus interacts with the human immune system advise that: “therapeutic agents that bolster the innate immune response, including activation of NK [Natural Killer] cells, should be the target of future studies” (8). What are some of these “therapeutic agents?” In reality, simply making healthy choices are the most effective ways of improving the function of the innate immune system. For instance, smoking cessation should be widely advised to the US population due to the fact that benzopyrene, a carcinogenic substance found in tobacco products, kills human Natural Killer cells (9). Furthermore, most Americans are ingesting benzopyrene-laden foods on a daily basis due to poor dietary choices (10). And this is just one single chemical effecting immune system function! What about other aspect of a healthy lifestyle: such as adequate sleep, hydration status, exercise and exercise intensity, moderate sunlight exposure, etc.?

The answer is simple: it’s really all about the “Benjamin’s.” If Americans became increasingly healthy three things would happen: 1) many trillion dollar industries would be bankrupted (tobacco, alcohol, beverage, unscrupulous food producers, etc.); 2) we would no longer need to patronize our burgeoning medical system as frequently (in turn bankrupting hospitals, the pharmaceutical industry, and putting many well paid health professionals out of a job); and, 3) the average American would be happier and more productive.

So there you have it… I believe the reason we are not all hearing the call to improve our health is because we are valued more as merchandise than human beings and a “miracle” vaccine or “wonder” drug would keep everything going on perfectly as it has been in the past…

My fellow Americans, Ebola is not actually the enemy… In fact, the biggest threat to our security and economic prosperity today would be for us to continue on in this sort of denial and prideful obstinacy. Thus, the biggest enemy to the US, in verity, is us…

So, pandemic or not, I believe it’s time for a different direction: towards truth, towards health… Onward Prebola©!

Have you been benefited and blessed by our coverage of the Ebola Pandemic? If so please consider contributing to our ministry. Your much-needed support is greatly appreciated!

References:
1)http://www.nbcnews.com/watch/nbc-news/obama-says-risk-of-ebola-outbreak-in-u-s-is-extremely-low-330003523744
2)http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/09/19/ebola-in-the-u-s-dont-bet-on-it/
3)http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/cdc-confirms-first-case-ebola-the-united-states?cid=sm_m_main_1_20140930_32612066
4) Int. J. Exp. Path. (1995), 76, 227-236
5) Clin Exp Immunol. 2001 Jun;124(3):453-60.
6) http://www.flu.gov/about_the_flu/seasonal/
7) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/
8) J Exp Med. Jul 19, 2004; 200(2): 169–179.
9) Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34(4):283-7
10) http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/14/8/2030.full



0 Comments

A Condition More Dangerous than Ebola?

9/28/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
The focus of this article will be one of the most dangerous of all modern pandemics... This pandemic is not limited to the rural highways and byways of ill-fated Sierra Leone nor is it without a victim in the most posh penthouse palaces of Manhattan. In fact... you may even be infected! Don't worry, here's a quick test to determine your status.

Please consider the following scenario... (there really is a point to this by the way)

Let's say you were watching your favorite TV show when the local news agency interrupted the broadcast and alerted viewers that Ebola was now a reality in the US: that New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and [your local city] were experiencing massive amounts of casualties. You watched in horror as emergency rooms were overrun and the infection spread like a raging fire! Next you saw that the President had declared a state-of-emergency, declared martial law to be in effect and seized control of all "needed" services and facilities by means of a executive order passed in 2012 (1), doctors and nurses now had to follow federal treatment guidelines or face misdemeanor charges and loss of licensure, according to the guidelines from the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (2). Families who refused the experimental vaccine "fast-tracked" by the FDA were reminded that, according to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974, they would lose custody of their children and face felony charges if they did not comply... Chaos ensues...

Glad this isn't the current reality right? I am too...

Okay... now back to our test. Here are the results: If you right now are in utter disbelief and amazement at how I could even imagine such a scenario you, very well, my friend, may be infected... with something called "normalcy bias." Wikipedia states that this "
refers to a mental state people enter when facing a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the possibility of a disaster occurring and its possible effects. This may result in situations where people fail to adequately prepare for a disaster, and on a larger scale, the failure of governments to include the populace in its disaster preparations. The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred then it never will occur. It can result in the inability of people to cope with a disaster once it occurs. People with a normalcy bias have difficulties reacting to something they have not experienced before. People also tend to interpret warnings in the most optimistic way possible, seizing on any ambiguities to infer a less serious situation."

On the contrary, if you are trembling with fear and about to go outside to build your underground bunker you are also infected: with "worst case scenario bias." This, of course, is a form of severe overreaction. If you are actually thinking: okay this is possible... what can I do to truly "prepare" you are deemed "normal" and pass the test :)

How did you fare? Are you "normal?" Do you want to be? Then what are you doing to prepare? Get ready! Get ready! Get ready (yes, this is important)!

1)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness
2)http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf
3)https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/federal/index.cfm?event=federalLegislation.viewLegis&id=2


1 Comment

Dead Monkeys Don't Lie...

9/26/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
According to the World Health Organization, the Zaire Ebolavirus is spread via contact with infected bodily fluids (1). The official word is that this virus cannot be transmitted via aerosol, meaning that it cannot travel through the air and cause infection. However, six monkeys at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, in Frederick Maryland, beg to differ. Why? It has to do with a study specifically designed to determine whether or not Ebola could be transmitted via aerosolized droplets and actually cause an infection. The researchers theorized that this was indeed possible: citing incidents where infection occurred in the laboratory setting where no other transmission route seemed plausible (2).

The study population consisted of six Rhesus monkeys, two were “lucky” and four were not: reason being that two monkeys were not exposed to the virus at all. However the four chosen monkeys were inoculated with varying doses of airborne Ebolavirus. Those that received a relatively low dose of the virus had exactly the same outcome as those that received the higher dose: a speedy and torturous death (within 4-5 days of exposure). These research scientists were puzzled at why Ebola spread so effectively in the laboratory airborne environment but didn’t seem to have the same effect in the hot and humid native environment. However, what they finally concluded may shock you! Here are there findings:

“We also demonstrated aerosol transmission of Ebola virus at lower temperature and humidity than that normally present in sub-Saharan Africa. Ebola virus sensitivity to the high temperatures and humidity in the thatched, mud, and wattel huts shared by infected family members in southern Sudan and northern Zaire may have been a factor limiting aerosol transmission of Ebola virus in the African epidemics. Both elevated temperature and relative humidity (RH) have been shown to reduce the aerosol stability of viruses (Songer 1967)… If the same holds true for filoviruses, aerosol transmission is a greater threat in modern hospital or laboratory settings than it is in the natural climatic ranges of viruses.”

Thus, as the rainy season draws to a close in Sub-Saharan Africa, this November, and humidity levels drop we could see a tremendous increase in Ebola transmission. Why? Because the virus can, and does, travel via the airborne route, just not so well in hot and humid places. Can you name a few more environments, besides hospitals and laboratories, as the researchers mentioned, that are cooler and less humid? The answer to this question should prompt us to instant sobriety… This would be just about anywhere humans congregate in westernized countries: climate controlled building (including grocery stores, shopping malls, movie theaters, etc.), modern methods of transit (jetliners, automobiles, buses, etc.), and many other places besides! What does this all mean? Take home message is that, especially come this winter, the Ebola pandemic may be much more than we are bargaining for… The politicians and public health officials may be telling half of the story... But dead monkeys don’t lie.

The time to prepare is now. Get the facts. Get healthy. Get Prebola©!

(1) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/
(2) Int. J. Exp. Path. (1995), 76, 227-236


2 Comments

Prebola Live Broadcast: Class #1

9/24/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
The Bible tells us that "as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be" Matthew 24:37. How does the current state of affairs in our world resemble that of the antediluvians? Well, of course, iniquity abounds... But another equally insidious quality is permeating the world's population. It is found in principles revealed in the next few verses in Matthew 24: "For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away..."

Obviously, eating and drinking are a necessity of life; and marriage, when rightly entered upon, is a great social blessing... Why then did the people of Noah's time "know not" in regards to the coming catastrophic worldwide calamity until the flood indeed came and took them away: even to a watery grave? It was not because they had never heard the warning, for Noah was preaching this message 120 years! Rather, it was because the people decided, when warned, to do nothing and continue living life as usual (eating, drinking, seeking a mate, etc). Most assuredly there were many counter-messages, promising peace and public safety, that effectively silenced the words of caution in the minds of those who prized a life of ease and continuation of "business as usual" above repentance and reformation.

Are we today guilty of this same fault? Have we taken the time to examine warning and reproof
... To, with an open mind, know if these things are so? We are warned that pestilence is one of the signs of the times... Furthermore we may even have read counsel like this prompting us to greater acknowledgment of our responsibility:

"We have come to a time when every member of the church should take hold of medical missionary work. The world is a lazar house filled with victims of both physical and spiritual disease. Everywhere people are perishing for lack of a knowledge of the truths that have been committed to us. The members of the church are in need of an awakening, that they may realize their responsibility to impart these truths." --Testimonies, Vol. 7, p. 62.

Unfortunately, only a small percentage of Christians today are awake to this message, and actively engaged in the "building the ark." Therefore, my question to you today is, when the flood comes, what will become of you and those you love? What will become of your neighbors and co-workers? Are you of those who hearing do not hear and seeing do not see? If so, let us "shake [ourselves] from the dust; arise, and sit down, O Jerusalem: loose [ourselves] from the bands of [our] neck, O captive daughter of Zion" Isaiah 52:2. Are you ready to hear the truth: to examine and assimilate it into actual practice? If so, It's time for class... It's time for Prebola
©! Download the .mp3 below to listen to the audio recording from a live conference call regarding the Prebola© Pandemic Preparedness Course

Picture
Prebola Class #1.mp3
File Size: 152893 kb
File Type: mp3
Download File

1 Comment

Ebola... no cause for alarm? Really???

9/23/2014

0 Comments

 
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." -Patrick Henry, March, 23 1775
Picture
Words of wisdom? Or, was Patrick Henry just another negative-minded controversialist looking for a worst-case-scenario to dwell upon? I believe history reveals the true motive behind this founding father's "give me liberty or give me death" mentality. Some might say that dwelling upon issues like potential disease outbreaks are insignificant and unnecessary.
In fact, I was recently asked why I believe Ebola is a global threat when many researchers are predicting low probabilities (3-15% for example) of Ebola spreading to the US (1). To set the record straight, I do not believe that the current outbreak of Ebola will, without a doubt, become a worldwide pandemic. But, what I do believe is that this scenario is a definite possibility. Here are some of the reasons why... When an infectious agent becomes so virulent and deadly as this current strain of Ebola even the "experts" do not know, with all certainty, what is going to happen.

Consider these facts: 1) Ebola is infecting people (person-to-person) exponentially, possibly even via aerosol (through the air) (2), the CDC estimates 1.4 million deaths by January (3); 2) the current strain of Ebola is also being spread by bats and other migratory mammals (4); 3) symptoms from Ebola infection can take as long as three weeks to emerge (ibid); 4) we still have massive global transit occurring; 5) still no proven treatment or vaccine even though Ebola variants have been around since 1976 (ibid); 6) worldwide focus of healthcare is not on prevention and wellness - generating poor health and weak immune systems; and 7) the promise, in Matthew 24, of pestilences in the last days combined with the cry of "peace and safety" before "sudden destruction" (1 Thessalonians 5:3) that characterize the public proclamations in the Biblical "end times."

While I am glad that many "experts" are optimistic about the curtailment of this pandemic, the facts prompt me to preparedness. My conclusion? Time may tell if Ebola will retreat... But, as for me, I intend to know the worst, and to provide for it... Onward
Prebola!
(1) http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/09/19/ebola-in-the-u-s-dont-bet-on-it/
(2) http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2014/09/commentary-health-workers-need-optimal-respiratory-protection-ebola
(3) http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/23/cdc-ebola-1-4-million.html
(4) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/
0 Comments

Herbs for Ebola?

9/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Common Plantain (edible and high in vitamin K)
Does the high 77% mortality rate behind the current strain of Ebola virus alarm you? What about the fact that the medications used to "treat" this deadly outbreak are purely experimental: with no proven track record of success or documentation of potentially severe adverse effects?
Because of these issues, and more, many are turning to tried and true herbal remedies. For instance, Cat's Claw, because of its antiviral and immunomodulating action, has shown remarkable ability to fight another dangerous type of hemorrhagic illness (dengue fever). Cayenne and yarrow have been used for centuries to control excessive bleeding: which is the most frequent cause of death in Ebola victims. And, scientific studies on stinging nettle have revealed the herb's seemingly inherent ability to reduce tumor necrosis factor (TNF): one of the reasons for the hemorrhagic effects resulting from Ebola infection.

All this knowledge is important... But what if these herbs are unavailable? If trends continue, the Ebola virus will soon be knocking at our door and our meager supply of commercially available herbs will be quickly depleted. The time to order some of these items may be sooner rather than later... But even more importantly, learn about the beneficial aspects of local herbs: you would be surprised at what you may find in your own backyard. It may be a good time to invest in a pocket herb field guide (and a pocket Bible as well)!
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    RSS Feed

    Author

    Ron Meinhardt

    Archives

    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2020
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2015
    November 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2013

    Categories

    All

Health Education Resources:
Seminars
Health News
Health Products
Simply Amazing Health Series




Contact Us:
Online Contact Form
Email: founder@healthislife.org
Sign-up for Our Newsletter
All Elements Copyright © 2023 by Entering Wedge Media, LLC
Photos used under Creative Commons from AJC1, Luiz Fernando / Sonia Maria, jeffgunn, Amy L. Riddle, Eric Kilby, Tambako the Jaguar